Comparison

Zepth vs Autodesk Construction Cloud (now Autodesk Forma)

Autodesk’s construction offering — rebranded into Autodesk Forma in March 2026 — is the natural home for teams whose world runs on Revit and the Autodesk design ecosystem. Zepth is an AI-native platform for running the project itself — delivery, procurement and the operating asset — on one data foundation, whatever design tools you use.

About Autodesk Construction Cloud

No one connects design to construction like Autodesk: cloud worksharing for Revit, model coordination and clash detection, and a common data environment aligned with ISO 19650 practice.

For BIM-mandated projects and design-led workflows the ecosystem is genuinely unmatched, and its 2026 unification under the Forma platform continues that direction. Zepth integrates with BIM workflows — models and CAD viewable in the browser — rather than competing with design authoring.

Choose Autodesk Construction Cloud if…

  • Your workflows are design-centric: Revit worksharing, model coordination and clash management are the daily work.
  • You’re on a BIM-mandated programme standardized on Autodesk deliverables end-to-end.
  • Design-to-field model continuity is the primary value you’re buying.

Zepth is an AI-native construction management platform built around a common data environment (CDE). Teams evaluating alternatives typically weigh it on six attributes:

  1. 1

    One connected record. Documents, drawings, transmittals, correspondence, RFIs and submittals live in a controlled common data environment — one current version of everything, with a full audit trail.

  2. 2

    Unified data across the whole lifecycle. Three products — Zepth Core (design & construction), Zepth Vector (procurement) and Zepth Edge (assets & financial management) — run on one data foundation. The RFI knows the contract; the invoice knows the delivery; the asset knows its construction history. Cost control runs across the lifecycle, from procurement commitments to operating budgets.

  3. 3

    AI built into every module, not bolted on. Zepth’s AI reviews submittals and RFIs against drawings and specifications, drafts responses with citations, compares bids line-by-line, matches invoices to deliveries, and flags risks early — with a confidence score on every finding and human sign-off on anything consequential.

  4. 4

    Pricing that doesn’t scale with construction volume. Zepth does not charge based on the value of construction running through the platform, so costs stay predictable as your project pipeline grows. You pay for the modules you turn on — never per user, with storage included and AI metered by usage.

  5. 5

    Built to be usable. Field-first workflows designed so site teams adopt them quickly — from kickoff to go-live in four steps, running alongside the tools you already have. No rip-and-replace.

  6. 6

    Support that stays with you. Hands-on implementation and training with your real project data — teams productive from day one, not after a year-long rollout. Working-hours support (9×5, your local time) is included in the subscription rather than sold back to you as a tier.

Zepth is strongest for owners, developers, and consultants/PMCs who need visibility from first drawing to operating asset. It runs on live construction, real estate, infrastructure and hospitality projects, with deep GCC workflow support — FIDIC-aligned processes, authority approvals, and AED-first multi-currency.

Choose Zepth if…

  • Your centre of gravity is delivering and operating the project — documents, quality, procurement, cost, assets — with design tools as an input, not the platform.
  • You want procurement and finance in the same record as the field: tenders, POs, invoice matching, budgets.
  • You’re an owner or operator whose platform must outlive construction and run the asset.

Five questions to ask any platform vendor

  1. 1Does the AI review documents against *our* drawings and contract — and cite its sources?
  2. 2Does the platform follow the asset after handover, or does its record end at closeout?
  3. 3Does pricing scale with our construction volume, our user count, or neither?
  4. 4How long from kickoff to a productive site team — weeks or quarters?
  5. 5Where does our data live, and what happens to it if we leave?

Common questions

Is Zepth an Autodesk Construction Cloud alternative?

Yes — for construction delivery, procurement and asset management. Teams often pair design authoring in Autodesk tools with Zepth as the project and asset record; Zepth’s browser-based viewer handles BIM and CAD formats without desktop software.

Did Autodesk Construction Cloud change its name?

Yes — in March 2026 it was folded into Autodesk Forma (Build, Docs and Takeoff continue under Forma names). This page covers both names.

Does Zepth work with BIM?

Yes — model and drawing viewing in the browser across major formats, linked to the project record. Zepth complements design tools; it doesn’t replace them.

Read the full answer

Who is Zepth best for?

Owners, developers and consultants/PMCs managing projects from first drawing to operating asset — including construction, real estate, infrastructure and hotel portfolios.

Read the full answer

Verified July 2026

  • July 2026 — Page created. Covers both the Autodesk Construction Cloud and Autodesk Forma names.

This page describes what each platform was built for. It carries no competitor pricing, review scores or feature claims — those go out of date, and a comparison that is out of date is worse than none. The questions above are how you find today’s answers, from the vendors themselves.

See how it works

See Zepth on your project.

Bring a real, messy export from your current system. Every demo is impressive on clean data.

Book a meeting