How does retention release work?
In two halves, against two triggers. The first moiety is released at taking-over — practical completion — and the second at the end of the defects liability period, once the defects are closed. Both are money the subcontractor has already earned and you are holding. Which is why an orphaned retention, held past its trigger with nobody accountable, is not an administrative untidiness. It is somebody else’s money.
The two moieties, and what actually releases them
Retention is deducted from each payment — commonly a small percentage, capped at a limit — and held as security that the work will be completed and the defects made good.
The first half comes back at taking-over. The second comes back when the defects liability period ends and the outstanding defects have been closed. Those are the triggers, and they are events, not dates: a defects period that never formally closes is a retention that never formally releases.
Orphaned retentions are the failure mode
A retention held past its release trigger, with nobody accountable for noticing, is a classic audit finding. It is also an acid on subcontractor relationships — the subcontractor knows exactly what you owe them and exactly how long you have held it, even when you have forgotten.
And on the UK evidence it is a genuine insolvency exposure. Government research found billions held in retention at any one time, with hundreds of millions a year lost to upstream insolvency — and 44% of surveyed contractors had lost retention money that way. That is money already earned, sitting in somebody else’s account, disappearing when they fail.
The alternative, and the reform
A retention bond replaces cash retention with a bond — the security stays, and the subcontractor keeps its cash. It costs a premium, and on a cash-tight subcontractor that premium is often cheaper than the working capital it frees.
Retention reform is also a live regulatory question in the UK, with proposals to ban or ring-fence retentions under active consideration. Worth watching if you have UK exposure, and worth not building a business model on retention float either way.
In the guides
Terms
References
- module: /modules/contract-management/ — UK BEIS / Pye Tait retention research; first and second moiety release triggers
Zepth is the construction project delivery platform — it runs construction, procurement and asset management on one record, and does the work: reading the drawings, reviewing the submittals, matching the invoices and flagging the risks, with a human sign-off on anything consequential.
Related questions
See Zepth on your project.
A short, tailored walkthrough on your real workflow — no generic demo.
Book a meeting